your blog is good because people can relate to it… you are a good entertainer. and your ability to produce material is very impressive. i respect what you do.

i was trying to get you to say something about yourself, and what you do, in order to have more insight in to the way that your style works… because your style intrigues me. and i probably took it a bit overboard… I think you are a pioneer within the current realm of self-promoted entertainment.

ultimately i found out that your presentation style just doesn’t involve long-winded debates focused on analysis and introspection… well at least the debates won’t happen with strangers that ask personal questions out of nowhere. your public persona just comes off as more casual and edgy/witty… there is certainly more to ‘you’ (the person that your readers don’t have access to) than being casual and edgy/witty… otherwise you wouldn’t be able to produce the amount of stuff that you do… there is a form of discipline that goes unseen… and the ability to create structure on your own in a completely free-form environment… the discipline required to create and the maintenance of structure are very difficult.

it was pretty shitty of me to go about prying the way i did. but you have helped me to figure out some interesting things about the battle of the pompous intellect versus the stylishly intelligent… i realize those titles are bullshit… whatever. basically my interest is in expressing the difference between two types of intelligent people within the current internet-based world that couldn’t be any more socially dissonant while inhabiting the same social arena.

this is not to say that i wasn’t invested in what i was saying in all the emails…
if a winner and a loser were to be declared… you would be the winner.

i’ll send you the short story when i write it.